Background: \n\nStudent possesses a wide range of learning process and it is necessary for every teacher to guide them effectively according to their needs. Multiple modalities are available to give information to the learner to keep their attention and motivation in their study so there is a need of shifting from traditional large group teacher centric education to the multimodal student centric interactive approach. Every student has different approach in gathering and processing the information for learning, there for educationist should know the learning styles and study approaches of their students for guiding them to improve their outcomes. \nAims and objectives:\n\n1. To identify the learning styles and approaches of second year M.B.B.S students who passed out recently.\n\n2. To inform the students regarding availability of different methods for optimum learning.\n\n3. To sensitize the students regarding the pros and cons of different methods and make them aware regarding the proper utilization of learning methods.\n\n4. To make them aware regarding newer methods for gaining knowledge and performing better in the examination.\n\nMethodology: \nThe current study is aimed to identify learning approaches (deep, Strategic and superficial) and learning style (auditory, visual and haptic) among the newly entered second MBBS students by using questionnaire prepared by O’ Brein (30 items) and ASSIST( the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students 52 items) to find out their learning process during first MBBS study.\n\nFindings: \nThe two types of questionnaire were given to the students in their respective practical class held on every thursday. On day one, 124 students were present while on day two, 128 students were present. Visual and haptic are the most common styles while deep and strategic approaches are more common. Males are more as compared to female students . Visual and haptic are the most common styles while deep and strategic approaches are more common. Males (66) are more as compared to female students (59).\n\nConclusions:\nIn present study, it is observed that Out of 124 students, males are having more visual style (76%) while females are having more haptic style (75%) of learning. In combination, the students are having more visual and haptic styles of learning (75%) as compared to the auditory (56%). To gain the knowledge deep and strategic (in both 97%) approaches are more as compared to the superficial one (74%).In sex wise distribution all females (100%) are having deep approach while 95% males are having deep approach while strategic approach more common in female (90%) as compared to male (85.29%). Superficial approach is observed in 42.19 % students, more in male (45.59%) as compared to females (38.33%). Those are having deep and strategic approach as well as haptic and visual style of learning are having better grades than those having superficial approach and auditory style of learning.